Who Are The Beasts of The Field? Part 1

In multiple places in the Bible there are references to the word “beast”, and, or, "Beasts Of The Field."

An example of this word and phrase that is germane to this particular post is the following: “But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth and cry mightily unto God.” Jonah 3:8. This verse says the word man and also refers to something called a beast that cover themselves with sackcloth. What is this beast that the Bible talks about?

There seems to be a natural tendency for the modern day Judeo-Christian to read right over the word “beast” and think it means cattle, or when specifically shown that it doesn't mean cattle they just simply dismiss it as being a descendant of Adam or in this particular case Israelites (Jonah was tasked to preach to the Israelites that were in the Assyrian captivity in Ninevah). When specifically referring to cattle in this verse, never in my lifetime, have I ever seen a four legged creature cover themselves in sackcloth and repent to God as in the story of Jonah. If referring to the Adamite man, or an Israelite, then all one has to do is read the book of Genesis to know that Adam was created in Chapter 2 of Genesis after the animals and other life forms were created during the 7 days of Chapter 1. Adam being separate from other life forms is exemplified in Genesis 5:1.

The distinguishing element in the Bible that demonstrates the separation between man and beast is when the Bible describes Adam. Man of course refers to the man Adam and his descendants (Strong's Concordance #119 and #120). The word Adam means to be be ruddy, show blood in the face, be fair skinned, or have the ability to blush.

This frame was taken from the Patterson Film of 1969 showing a random encounter with a Bigfoot. Is this the elusive beast mentioned many times in the Bible? I think not. I have a hard time believing that this Bigfoot creature even exists.

What are the words that the word beast translates from?

The words that are used to describe “beasts” in Hebrew are the words “Behemah” which means brute beast #929, “Beir” which also means brute beast, and “Chevya” which means a creature separate from Adam man #2423.

Examples of how these words are used are as follows...

Exodus 9:9 The Father caused boils to cover Egyptians and the beasts. One could use the argument that the Bible is talking about the Egyptian cattle that is overlooked and this is in the preceding verse #6 when all the cattle of the Egyptians were dead already. So from this we can take the idea that the beasts were not cattle and they were in Egypt with the Israelites.

Exodus 9:19 The Bible tells us that the beasts worked side by side with Israelite men in the field and the Israelites and beasts both had homes.

Exodus 11:5-7 Tells us that the first born of the beasts died as well as the first born of the Egyptians. The cattle again were dead and the Bible tells us that the beasts are separate from the Israelites.

Exodus 19:13 The beasts left Egypt with the Israelites and both were told not to touch the mountain with their hands. Notice he did not tell the beasts to not touch the mountain with their paws nor hooves, and they wouldn't have understood what Moses was talking about anyway. So the beasts understood simple directions and had hands.

Exodus 22:19 The Bible tells us that if an Israelite lay with a beast then they are to be put to death.

Leviticus 20:15-16 Tells us the same thing as above in Exodus 22:19, which is to not lay with a beast. The only difference here is that this verse states if you lay with a beast, then both the man and beast will be put to death. Both being put to death is proof that the man or woman as well as the beast knew what they were doing was wrong. An example of this particular law being enforced can be found in Numbers Chapter 25. This concept is totally different then a man or woman with a quadruped animal.

Jeremiah 31:27 As a sign in the last days, the beasts will be mixing their seed with the seed of man, which is the definition of the word of miscegenation. So we know the beasts seed can be mixed with seed of the Israelite.

Exodus 23:29 When the Israelites entered Canaan land, the Father refused to completely empty out the land for the Israelites, otherwise the “Beasts of the field” would multiply against them. The Bible could not have been talking about lions or such because there were approximately 3 million Israelites coming with Moses to Canaan land. The few lions or so would not have been a problem for millions of Israelites to take care of, unless of course we are talking about beasts that could conduct raids on the Israelite encampments and attack Israelites in a concerted effort. So the beasts of the field can multiply and force the Israelites out of their own land.

Continued in Who Are The Beasts of The Field? Part 2

Who Are The Beasts Of The Field? Part 2

Continued from Who Are The Beasts Of The Field? Part 1

Judges 20:48 When the men of Israel attacked they not only killed the men, but also killed the beasts. The whole idea of warfare is for the conquering people is to take war booty which includes cattle. So, the cattle would not have been put to death, but rather would have been taken by the conquering tribe. This passage implies a beast can have loyalty to an enemy.

Jeremiah 33:10 The beasts lived in the streets of Jerusalem with the Israelites. A strange place to keep cattle, unless the Bible is talking about some other type of beast.

Numbers 31:46-47 Moses divides the booty (spoils of war) which in this case are the beasts of the field. Again this cannot mean cattle because the verses prior to these talk specifically about the cattle being divided, so it means something else.

Jeremiah 27:6 The beasts of the field in Jerusalem were given to the King Of Babylon, Nebuchadnezzer, to serve him.

Daniel 4:25 When Nebuchadnezzer went insane he was taken care of by the beasts of the field. This cannot mean lions and such because it is more likely that they would have killed him and ate him instead of tending to his physical needs.

Other information about the beasts can come from Zechariah 8:10 when we are told that the beasts are employable just like Israelite men are. We know beasts have a spirit as mentioned in Ecclesiastes 3:21, and have a consciousness and ability to worship the Father as creator Isaiah; 43:20.

So at this point what can we determine about the beasts from the Bible in the preceding verses? We know they are a separate life form from Adam. We know they were with the Israelites in Egypt. They worked side by side with men and had homes. They had hands to work with. They know it is wrong to lie with an Israelite man or woman. They have the ability to mix their seed with the Israelite seed. They can multiply rapidly and can conduct raids or warfare against Israelites. They lived in the streets of Jerusalem. They were able to tend to or take care of a person (King Nebuchadnezzer). They are employable and have a spirit with the ability to worship the Father as creator. This brings us back to the original question of who are the beasts of the field?

At this point I have to tell where I am going with this post and admittedly, I am interjecting my own opinion. If others have a different opinion then feel free to post your thoughts, I would love to hear them.

The Bible is a book that was written about Israel and is written to Israel. It's my opinion that the word beast is a bad translation in the King James Bible that envisions things such as a bull in a china shop, and if one does the research then they will come to realize that the proper translation should have been something similar to “Non-Israelite” and not simply the word beast, as it can be degrading to other races and can steer other races away that wish to follow the Bible and can benefit directly from following the laws of Yahweh. I am in no way implying that other races of people can become Israelites.

This is the truth...

As I have said many times before that the Bible does not mention any other race of people except for when they come into contact with Israel. What makes an Israelite an Israelite is not just a matter of fair skin from a blood line that comes from a very small portion of the people we call Adamites, but rather true Israelites also have to have a calling from the Father (John 6:44) to rule in the New Jerusalem when it comes to earth. Let me explain it this way, when Abraham received his blessing from Yahweh, there were other fair skinned people on earth that did not receive Abrahams blessing, so fair skin and the ability to blush is not the only requirement! This is why the Bible tells us that there is only a little flock Luke 12:32.

The word Israel means, to rule with God, or to rule under Gods's laws. So it's my opinion that not only are the beasts Non-Israelites, but the beasts can also be fair skinned Israelites that disregard and will not adhere to the laws of Father Yahweh. The Israelites that ignore their calling and live as beasts, become beasts such as illustrated in the parable of The Lost Son in Luke 15:11-32.

When The Lost Son returned to the Father he was restored to his proper position in his Fathers house, given a robe, and a ring. This is why I believe that no matter what any Israelite has ever done in their lifetime they can always change.

Praise the Lord!

Should Christians Obey The Law?

We are living in a time when those who call themselves “Christian” are perplexed by the laws of man. They know down deep spiritually that mans laws are against the laws of Yahweh, but are told that following the laws of man is the right thing to do. The people that I wholeheartedly believe are responsible for putting this lie out and causing the confusion of people, are spiritual advisors of Christians, namely the modern day Baal priests who fill the pulpits of the Governmental 501c3 churches and work directly with the Government for the specific purpose of simply just keeping the status quo. This idea has come to light in the media recently when a pastor of a church in Washington State told his congregation to blindly follow the Government and call 911 on their neighbors. To see what I am talking about click HERE.

The fuel that propels this train of misinformation is through the misinterpretation of Romans Chapter 13 Verses one and two that state:

“Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.”

On the surface the preceding two verses would seem to indicate that we should obey all the laws that men make. The above verses make little sense when put in their proper context by reading verses 3 and 4 of the same chapter.

“For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? Do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same. For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger in execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.” Romans 13:3-4

Of course when the preachers that teach Christians to give themselves over to mans government are confronted with verses 3 and 4 they become silent. This is because there is nothing in mans earthly government that remotely sounds like anything in verses 3-4. Another point to be made is that there are many examples of people not following the laws of man throughout the Bible. 

This is only a partial list: Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in Daniel 3, The midwives of Exodus 1, Moses in Exodus 2:5-14, Rahab of Joshua 2, Daniel in Daniel Chapter 6, all the Apostles in Acts Chapter 4-5, and of course there are others.

Follow mans laws only when it doesn't go against the Bible.

Obeying the law is a way that keeps order in society. So obeying God's law isn't so much of disobeying the laws of man but rather it's obeying the laws of the Father in promoting his kingdom here on earth, it's just that simple. Obeying mans law is something we should do as long as it doesn't go against the Fathers laws. Any Christian that follows mans laws before they follow Yah's laws are submitting themselves to every Anti-Christ that comes along. The thought that exists going into Romans 13 can be found a few verses before Romans 13:1-2 in Romans 12:18 where the bible states that if possible, live in peace with all men. An example of living in peace with men while at the same time without breaking Yah's laws could be the speed limit law while driving. If mans law is 35 on a particular road and a Christian seems to think it should be able to drive 55, then the Christian is obligated to drive the speed limit of 35 MPH that is posted.

However mans laws that force you to go directly against the laws of God, and that go directly against the spirit of God such as being drafted into the military to fight an ungodly war in other countries with people that have done absolutely to us nor our country is wrong and is called murder. This particular example is a black and white example and is not something that falls in the gray category because it goes directly against the commandments of God. 

There are 614 laws that we are to live by as Christians such as simply putting a handrail on a rooftop when working on a roof, or the dietary food laws of eating pork that directly effect health both of which are not commandments, but rather are laws that effect you health and well being. 

If you do such things then do not blame Yahweh if you become injured or sick and die of trichinosis. 

As always I encourage all to not just take my word for anything, but rather want all to study for themselves as Yahweh's holy spirit would lead them. 

For those who have the desire to read more about this subject I recommend the book by Ted Weiland and is called "Christian Duty Under Corrupt Government."

Praise the Lord!