Two Creations?

In chapters one and two of Genesis there seems to be two different accounts of creation that most clergy seem to want to ignore. Others who would like to disprove the bible, mainly the anti-Christ atheist type like to dwell on the two seemingly separate accounts and try to use it as evidence to demonstrate the fallacy of the bible. Those trying to disprove the bible claim that if the writers of the bible did not get the creation story correct then what other incorrect writings are contained in it also?

I have stated before in this blog that I believe both science and the bible are correct when the bible is correctly interpreted. Because both “creations” were written in the same manuscript at the same time one after another, it's obvious to me that one is just a continuation of another. Which is exactly the way it is printed in the bible. So, it's not two creations, but rather only one. I encourage all to read the two chapters to  see what I am talking about.

Link to Genesis chapters 1 and 2.

When you believe that in chapter one the world was created, then in chapter two Adam was created, it becomes obvious that Adam was not the first man on the earth. Things were wild on the earth before Adam. The bible is very clear that there was no person to till the soil, farm, or garden (Gen 2:5). So Father Yahweh created a protected place, or a garden for Adam and Eve. Chapter 2 is the first place the word Adam is used, so Adam and Eve were not created in the first chapter.

Just a couple of reasons out of many, why Preachers fall short...

In Gen 2:20 Moses wrote there was “no help meet for him.” Clergy that claim that both events are the same are at a loss when the bible says there was no help meet for Adam. Does this mean that Yahweh looked at fish, scorpions, and earth worms to try to find a help meet for Adam? No, this tells me there were no women on the earth that were able to cohabit with this Godly man Adam, as the bible is clear that the earth was a wild place because there had to be a garden made for Adam so to not be attacked by wild beasts. Maybe you could compare the earth with Mutual of Omaha's wild kingdom?

Another fallacy with the two events same story theory, is when one thinks Adam is the Father of everyone living leaves them with a loss of explanation for the lineage from Adam to Jesus being a very important thing in the bible. So important that it is listed multiple times to show the pure blood line between the two. Gen 4:14-15 states whoever finds Cain with his mark will kill him. Who is on the earth to kill him? Preachers cannot explain this passage either. It's also worth mentioning that the word “day” in Genesis comes from "yome" in Hebrew, Strongs #3117, it's an age or undetermined amount of time as the sun did not exist early in chapter 1. This is evidence that both science and the bible can very well be correct on the length of time. I could go on all day but, I want to keep this post short but informative enough for others to form a little interest and do a little research on their own.

If Adam is not the Father of all people then who is he?

The word Adam is the first clue on our quest. The word Adam is "aw-dam" in Hebrew, Strong's #119  which means to show blood in the face, ruddy or a blushing man. This is a trait of those with fair skin to be able to do this simple act.

Another clue comes from the time frame of the racially pure lineage from Adam to Yashua Messiah.

All theologians agree that there is about 4000 years between Adam and Yashua, and another 2000 from Yashua to us. What group of people have been on earth only for this small amount of time of less than 10,000 years ? The Asians have a written history of over 10,000 years and they have found remains of Asians that are over 100,000 years old. With the Blacks of Africa there is little or no written history and they have found remains of blacks in Africa that are over 160,000 years old.

However, there are no remains found of those we call Caucasians dating in excess of 10,000 years that I can find of by searching the internet. Yes, I do believe that science and the bible are correct, and we are the Johnny come lately of the earth. If anyone can find a link to a site that shows this not to be true then please post it in the comments section.

Needless to say, I believe we are here for a reason, and we are not doing our job very well.

I pray all will find out who they are and fulfill the mission that the Father has put us here to do!